Thousands of student loan approval letters from FedLoan Servicing are not binding and can be rescinded at any time.
According to a New York Times article “more than 550,000 people have signed up for a federal program that promises to repay their remaining student loans after they work 10 years in a public service job,” but now those letters may not be binding.
Four borrowers and the American Bar Association have filed a suit in United States District Court in Washington against the department alleging that the Education Department acted “arbitrarily and capriciously” in making its decisions about which employers qualified.
The plaintiffs held jobs that they initially were told qualified them for debt forgiveness, only to later have that decision reversed. The borrowers are suing to have their eligibility for the forgiveness program restored.
What is the forgiveness program? This program was approved by the federal government in 2007. People with federal student loans are offered incentives of having their student loans reduced or eliminated at the end of a period (normally 10 years) if they work for a public service company. That means these borrowers give up the opportunity to work in the private sector where presumably they would be paid more.
On its website, the Education Department directs borrowers who believe their employer qualifies to submit a certification form to FedLoan. If the form is approved, the Education Department transfers the borrower’s loans to FedLoan, which collects payments and tracks the borrower’s progress toward the 120 qualifying monthly payments they must make before the remaining balances will be forgiven.
Education Department’s response: the “FedLoan’s responses to borrowers’ certification forms cannot be trusted.”
A FedLoan approval letter “does not reflect a final agency action on the borrower’s qualifications” for the forgiveness program, the department wrote.
ABA said the Department’s response “illogical, untenable and bewildering”
Linda Klein, president of the American Bar Association, called the department’s response “illogical, untenable and bewildering.” An unreliable certification system “exposes those undertaking public service work — exactly what Congress intended them to do — to crippling financial risk,” she said.
Diane is a well respected Arizona bankruptcy and foreclosure attorney. As a retired law professor, she believes in offering everyone, not just her clients, advice about bankruptcy and Arizona foreclosure laws. Diane is also a mentor to hundreds of Arizona attorneys.
*Important Note from Diane: Everything on this web site is offered for educational purposes only and not intended to provide legal advice, nor create an attorney client relationship between you, me, or the author of any article. Information in this web site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from an attorney familiar with your personal circumstances and licensed to practice law in your state. Make sure to check out their reviews.*
In Case You Missed It
Published On: September 2, 2023
NEW STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN SAVE – “SAVING ON A VALUABLE EDUCATION” “SAVE” – New Student Loan Repayment Plan (8/23) 8/2023 To the relief of student [...]
Published On: July 19, 2023
IMPORTANT PROGRESS FOR STUDENT LOAN BORROWERS WHO HAVE BEEN IN REPAYMENT TWO DECADES OR MORE Posting from the National Consumer Law Center Important Progress for Student Loan Borrowers Reposting from NCLC, July [...]
Published On: April 18, 2022
Education Loans Can Be Discharged in Bankruptcy Busting myths about bankruptcy and private student loans By Robert G. Cameron – APR 12, 2022 (Reprint from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau "www.CFPB.gov". The following is an [...]
Published On: May 17, 2021
Operators of Student Loan Debt Relief Scheme Banned From Providing Debt Relief Services as Part of Settlement with FTC (Reprint from Federal Trade Commission, May 17, 2021) The operators of [...]
