CFPB Charges Performance SLC and Performance Settlement, Daniel Crenshaw, with Using Deceptive Tactics
November 5, 2020 – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau) filed a complaint against Performance SLC, LLC (PSLC), a California debt-relief business focused on federal student loan debt; Performance Settlement, LLC (PSettlement), a California debt-settlement company; and Daniel Crenshaw, the owner and CEO of the two companies. The Bureau alleges that PSLC and Crenshaw charged illegal advance fees in violation of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) to student loan borrowers seeking to obtain loan consolidation, loan forgiveness, or income-driven repayment plans for their federal student loans, and that PSLC failed to make required disclosures to certain consumers in violation of the TSR. The Bureau also alleges that PSettlement and Crenshaw used deceptive tactics in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA) in order to induce consumers to sign up for PSettlement’s services.
The Bureau’s complaint, which was filed in federal district court for the Central District of California, alleges that from 2015 through the present, PSLC charged consumers illegal upfront fees by using telemarketing campaigns to convince thousands of consumers to sign up for services to assist them in obtaining loan consolidation, loan forgiveness, or income-driven repayment plans from the U.S. Department of Education (ED). Consumers would pay between $1,000 and $1,450 in fees to PSLC for it to file paperwork with ED, even though student loan borrowers can do this themselves for free. Under the TSR, it is illegal to request or receive any fees for debt-relief services sold through telemarketing before the terms of the debt are altered or settled, and the consumer has made at least one payment under the newly altered debt. The Bureau alleges that the PSLC and Crenshaw violated the TSR because consumers were charged at or just after enrollment, before the terms of the debts were altered. The Bureau also alleges that PSLC had some consumers pay this prohibited upfront fee through high-interest financing from a third party. Some consumers paid a portion or all of their fee into a trust account, but the complaint alleges that PSLC failed to provide them with disclosures required by the TSR.
The complaint also alleges that PSettlement and Crenshaw, from as early as 2019, engaged in deceptive acts and practices in violation of the CFPA by representing to consumers that PSettlement, a debt-settlement company that does not make loans, had considered and rejected those consumers for personal loans to induce them to sign up for PSettlement’s debt-relief services. Finally, the Bureau alleges that Crenshaw substantially assisted PSLC in requesting or receiving fees illegally and PSettlement in engaging in deceptive acts and practices.
The complaint seeks redress to consumers, injunctive relief, and the imposition of civil money penalties against the defendants.
The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have violated the law.
The Bureau’s complaint is available at: https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_performance-slc-llc-performance-settlement-llc-daniel-crenshaw_complaint_2020-11.pdf
MUSINGS BY DIANE:
Yet another student loan “workout” company has been charged with receiving illegal fees and engaging in deceptive acts and practices. In this case approximately $9.2 million in illegal upfront fees. I feel bad for the law enforcement agencies seeing this same outrageous and fraudulent actions again and again. But I really get upset at the pain and suffering these horrible people are suffering on the innocent borrower who is trying to workout payments on their student loans. I know too well how how this causes unnecessary stress – resulting in difficulty at work and home, physical illness and a general distrust of the entire student loan system.
– Diane L. Drain

Diane is a well respected Arizona bankruptcy and foreclosure attorney. As a retired law professor, she believes in offering everyone, not just her clients, advice about bankruptcy and Arizona foreclosure laws. Diane is also a mentor to hundreds of Arizona attorneys.
*Important Note from Diane: Everything on this web site is offered for educational purposes only and not intended to provide legal advice, nor create an attorney client relationship between you, me, or the author of any article. Information in this web site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from an attorney familiar with your personal circumstances and licensed to practice law in your state. Make sure to check out their reviews.*
In Case You Missed It
Published On: September 2, 2023
NEW STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN SAVE – “SAVING ON A VALUABLE EDUCATION” “SAVE” – New Student Loan Repayment Plan (8/23) 8/2023 To the relief of student [...]
Published On: July 19, 2023
IMPORTANT PROGRESS FOR STUDENT LOAN BORROWERS WHO HAVE BEEN IN REPAYMENT TWO DECADES OR MORE Posting from the National Consumer Law Center Important Progress for Student Loan Borrowers Reposting from NCLC, July [...]
Published On: April 18, 2022
Education Loans Can Be Discharged in Bankruptcy Busting myths about bankruptcy and private student loans By Robert G. Cameron – APR 12, 2022 (Reprint from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau "www.CFPB.gov". The following is an [...]
Published On: May 17, 2021
Operators of Student Loan Debt Relief Scheme Banned From Providing Debt Relief Services as Part of Settlement with FTC (Reprint from Federal Trade Commission, May 17, 2021) The operators of [...]