What are “Real Property Tax Liens”?
When people fail to pay real property taxes on their homes, vacant land, and/or commercial buildings, Arizona law allows county governments to lien the real property for the unpaid taxes, effectively putting a mortgage on the property to pay the unpaid taxes. If the taxes are not paid within three years, the counties will sell the tax lien to investors at auction.
Arizona specifically, allows investors to purchase unpaid real property taxes from counties in the form of tax lien certificates on real property as an investment. Each year, counties hold auctions to sell unpaid property tax liens. Maricopa County, for example, holds its annual online auction in February. Some counties may have unsold tax lien certificates that they sell in addition to the auction.
An investor bids on the interest rate on the tax lien in the auction. According to Arizona law, an investor can earn up to 16 percent interest per year on a tax lien certificate. The bidder with the lowest interest rate bid wins the auction for each lien. If you are the successful bidder, you must pay the back taxes and obtain a tax lien certificate.
To redeem the tax lien certificate, the property owner must pay the taxes plus the 16 percent interest. The investor receives his investment plus the interest rate he bid at the auction, and the county receives the balance interest. If the property owner does not redeem the tax lien certificate within three years after purchase, the investor has the right to foreclose on the tax lien certificate by initiating a judicial foreclosure complaint.
More resources available below:
- 4QTKIDZ LLC, Blue Palo Servicing Co, and Cook Family Partnership, CV21-0065 (Az Supreme Court, 7/27/22) Under A.R.S. § 42-18202, lienholders must notify a property owner of their intent to foreclose before bringing an action to foreclose on the property owner’s right to redeem the lien. We must decide whether § 42-18202’s pre-litigation-notice requirement is satisfied upon delivery to the type of addresses specified in the statute, or whether a lienholder’s due diligence to obtain service of the notice is always required. Compelled by the statute’s text, context, and structure, we hold that delivery of a prelitigation notice to each of the three addresses referred to in subsections (A)(1)(a)–(c) is sufficient, even if the lienholder has reason to believe the property owner never received the notice.
- TFLTC v. Ford, (Az Supreme Court, 8-8-22) This case arises from five separate tax lien foreclosure actions, each brought pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18201 and consolidated on appeal. We granted review to decide whether Leveraged Land Co. v. Hodges, 226 Ariz. 382 (2011), precludes all attorney fees and costs incurred after a redemption certificate has issued, including those fees and costs incurred as a direct and necessary result of completing that redemption. We hold reasonable fees and costs arising from redemption itself are recoverable even though those expenses were incurred after the redemption.
- The Maricopa County delinquent tax-lien sale was good news for the County Treasury, but bad news for investors, By Mike Fimea, Arizona Business Gazette, February 19, 2004, volume 124,
- Buying Tax Liens: Not Entirely a Gold Investment, By Christopher McNichol
- Daystar vs Maricopa County Treasurer (Az Ct App, Div One 5-6-04) good review of tax liens statutes and governing law.

Diane is a well respected Arizona bankruptcy and foreclosure attorney. As a retired law professor, she believes in offering everyone, not just her clients, advice about bankruptcy and Arizona foreclosure laws. Diane is also a mentor to hundreds of Arizona attorneys.
*Important Note from Diane: Everything on this web site is offered for educational purposes only and not intended to provide legal advice, nor create an attorney client relationship between you, me, or the author of any article. Information in this web site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from an attorney familiar with your personal circumstances and licensed to practice law in your state. Make sure to check out their reviews.*
“You folks are the BEST OF THE BEST in Arizona.” M.H.
You and Jay are the best attorneys I have ever had or needed and thank God for the Honorable Robert Gottsfield in recommending you folks – I would have never made it through the entire process without you and Jay and God Bless you both always and stay in touch as well. You folks are the BEST OF THE BEST in Arizona.
“My only regret is that I didn’t find Diane sooner.” K.H.
I can’t say enough good things about Diane. The way she handled my not typical circumstances was amazing. I was very nervous to start the bankruptcy process but Diane just has a very comforting way of explaining the whole process. My only regret is that I didn’t find Diane sooner. If you find yourself in a financial situation that you can’t correct on your own, please Call Diane Drain as soon as possible.
“Filing for bankruptcy can be a stressful life event” R.A.
Filing for bankruptcy can be a stressful life event, and selecting the right attorney can add to this stress. Diane and Jay were a pleasure to work with, and it is obvious that they are passionate about helping people get their life back on track. I would highly recommend them if you need a bankruptcy attorney.
RELATED FAQs
My intention is to put you back in control of your life
Start with $0 down*. We provide affordable payment plans.