[print-me]
Bank of America holds gun to customers' head

Bank of America holding customers hostage…

One Very Pissed Off Judge Continues to Slam Bank of America

In re Sundquist v. Bank of America, Case No. 10-35624 (Bankruptcy court, E.D. CA. 1/18/18)

Bank of America, with a gun to the Sundquists’ heads…

This motion to dismiss began as a hostage standoff. Bank of America, with a gun to the Sundquists’ heads, said it would pay them several million dollars more than the $6,074,581.50 awarded to them, but only if this court first dismisses the adversary proceeding so as to vitiate the opinion in Sundquist v. Bank of America (In re Sundquist), 566 B.R. 563 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2017).
There being no legal obstacle to Bank of America paying the Sundquists without any judicial action, this was a naked effort to coerce this court to erase the record. No chance. No dice.

To name and to shame Bank of America on the public record in an opinion that stays on the books serves a valuable purpose…

This court remains persuaded that the conduct warranting significant damages resulted from a corporate culture that facilitates, and is unwilling to correct, the problems that Bank of America visited upon the Sundquists. Other courts have cited the decision. It has potentially useful implications regarding the efficacy of §§ 329(b) and 362(k) (1) as bankruptcy remedies.

To name and to shame Bank of America on the public record in an opinion that stays on the books serves a valuable purpose casting sunlight on practices that affect ordinary consumers.  Other persons dealing with Bank of America will be able to gauge their experiences against what has been revealed in this case.

Link to judge’s order…

Share This Post:
Diane L. Drain

Attorney, consumer advocate and retired law professor

About Diane Drain:

Diane is a well respected Arizona bankruptcy and foreclosure attorney. As a retired law professor, she believes in offering everyone, not just her clients, advice about Arizona bankruptcy and foreclosure laws. Diane is also a mentor to hundreds of Arizona attorneys.

I would be flattered if you connect with me on GOOGLE+ and ‘Like’ us on Facebook

*Important Note from Diane: Everything on this web site is offered for educational purposes only and not intended to provide legal advice nor create an attorney client relationship between you, me, or the author of any article. Any information in this web site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from an attorney familiar with your personal circumstances and licensed to practice law in your state. Make sure to check out their reviews.*

What Others Are Reading:

AZ Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Deficiency Protection for Residential Property

Feds Announce Litigation Against Law firms for Deceptive Loan Modification Practices

Reverse Mortgage – good or bad idea?

Another Non-Profit Scheme to Steal Homes