disclaimer stampThis website is not intended to be a legal advice resource. It is only meant to be used for educational reasons. Please don’t take any action or refrain from taking any action based on what you’ve read on this website. This website, article, or link may contain outdated, incorrect, or irrelevant information. It is your obligation to speak with an expert attorney who can apply current legislation or laws to your personal situation in a professional manner.

There is no attorney-client relationship formed by using this site or communicating with Law Office of D.L. Drain or any of our employees. Please read the complete disclaimer for additional information.

It is vital that you seek legal advice from a qualified attorney on your individual situation. It will almost certainly cost you less to seek advice before acting than it will to repair your mistakes.



In re: Addison, No. 07-2064, 07-2727 (U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 07, 2008) In a bankruptcy case, rulings against debtor and denial of discharge are affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the bankruptcy court clearly erred in finding that debtor converted nonexempt property into his homestead with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor; 2) it erred similarly in finding debtor transferred nonexempt funds into a Roth IRA with such intent; 3) the resultant denial of discharge required reversal; and 4) two 26 U.S.C. section 529 tuition savings accounts opened for the benefit of his children were nonexempt property of his bankruptcy estate.

See also – pre-bankruptcy planning.

In re Stern, No. 00-56431 (9th Cir. 02/04/2003) Feb. 6, 2003 TRANSFER OF ASSETS INTO EXEMPT PROFIT-SHARING RETIREMENT PLAN ON EVE OF BANKRUPTCY WAS NOT FRAUDULENT David A. Gill, Bankruptcy Trustee (“Trustee”), appeals the district court’s decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s order, which granted summary judgment in favor of the debtor Steven Stern (“Stern”). Stern cross-appeals the district court’s determination that Stern’s pension plan funds are not excluded from the bankruptcy estate.

Stern filed for bankruptcy after the entry of a sizable judgment against him in an arbitration proceeding. We must determine whether the transfer of proceeds from an Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) into a Profit Sharing Pension Plan was a fraudulent conveyance, subject to avoidance by the Trustee.

Constrained by our precedent, we AFFIRM the district court’s holding that, although the pension plan was properly included within the bankruptcy estate, the pension plan assets were exempt from distribution to Stern’s creditors.

In 1978, Stern terminated the 1974 Plan and created a qualified, defined benefit pension plan (“1978 Plan”). In 1989, Stern terminated the 1978 Plan and transferred the plan assets into an IRA account (“IRA”).
We are controlled by our prior opinion in Wudrick v. Clements, 451 F.2d 988 (9th Cir. 1971). In that case, we ruled “that the purposeful conversion of nonexempt assets to exempt assets on the eve of bankruptcy is not fraudulent per se.” In reversing the district court’s determination that Wudrick engaged in a fraudulent conveyance, we clarified that “[t]he finding of fraud was based solely on the fact that nonexempt assets were deliberately converted to exempt assets just prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.” Id. at 990. We explained that this “evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish fraud.” Id. Our analysis was impliedly affected by the clarification that a different conclusion might be reached “if on the eve of bankruptcy a debt were created with no intention of repaying the creditor . . . .” We also noted that a finding of fraud must be established by “clear and convincing” evidence. See also Retirement and Bankruptcy.

In re Beverly, 374 B.R. 221 (9th Cir.BAP 2007) affirmed in part, dismissed in part by In re Beverly, 551 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2008). BAP reversed the Bankruptcy Court by finding that Debtor and his former wife committed fraudulent transfers. Their divorce decree awarded the debt to the future Bankrupt while the former wife got all of the non-exempt property. The non-exempt property would have been enough to satisfy all of the debt. Contrast with

In re Bledsoe, 569 F. 3d 1106 (9thCir 2009) where the Court of Appeals found that the mere allegation that the property settlement of divorce decree did fairly divide property was insufficient under §548 without proof of actual fraud.

Don’t use the excuse that “my attorney told me to lie/cheat/steal.” This is not a defense; it is evidence that you are an idiot and you still go to prison.

US vs James P. Roti, No. 06-3192, U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 03, 2007, Easterbrook, Fraud triangleChief Judge. Saddled with a judgment for more than $400,000 on account of a guarantee of his small corporation’s debts, James Roti decided to hide his assets from creditors. He has been convicted of bankruptcy fraud, see 18 U.S.C. §157, and concealing assets from the bankruptcy trustee, see 18 U.S.C. §152. His sentence is 21 months’ imprisonment. Roti concedes that he parked some assets with family members and moved others to accounts unknown to his creditors, and that he lied to his principal creditor, to the federal bankruptcy court, and to the trustee. Roti says that his lawyer Andrew Werth put him up to it, and at trial he contended that he should be acquitted because Werth managed the scheme’s details. The jury rejected that defense—for it was no defense at all.

That two people cooperate to swindle a third does not excuse either of the schemers, even if one of them is a lawyer. Advice of counsel is not a free-standing defense; though a lawyer’s fully informed opinion that certain conduct is lawful (followed by conduct strictly in compliance with that opinion) can negate the mental state required for some crimes, including fraud. See United States v. Sprong, 287 F.3d 663, 665-66 (7th Cir. 2002); cf. United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1061 (7th Cir. 1993). But Roti does not contend that Werth assured him that concealing assets and lying to the court would be lawful. Roti did not call Werth as a witness or introduce any opinion letter. So it is hard to understand how Werth’s role, whatever it was, can negate scienter. Roti does not deny knowing that he was lying under oath, if not at the outset (he says that he signed blank schedules that Werth filled in and filed) then in his oral declaration at the creditors’ meeting under 11 U.S.C. §341 that all of the schedules were complete and correct.

See also Pre-Bankruptcy Planning

Several options:

If the LLC is liable for the debt separate and apart from the debtor’s personal liability.  The cleanest way may to dissolve the LLC prior to filing, which reduces risk of trustee poking around.  At a minimum, proceeds from selling assets must be used appropriately on business expenses and debts.  There’s still no guarantee of debtor retaining LLC name because it’s property of BK estate and not exempt.  Debtor can create a new LLC entity if they want to start a new business after bankruptcy.

If creditors:

If the LLC has creditors it is important to make sure the transfer of assets can sustain the LLC’s creditors attack (fraudulent conveyance, preferential treatment).  The owners of the LLC sell the assets, use the funds to pay taxes and then the employees (which includes the owners of the LLC) assuming such payment is not out of the ordinary.  Otherwise, the trustee could go after the LLC assets, as the trustee is now the member of the LLC.

Formally dissolve the LLC. List all company creditors in the debtor’s BK, including for any potential liability for wrongfully dissolving the company. That way it would be incumbent on any of those company creditors to file a non-dischargeability action against the debtor for wrongful dissolution or wrongful “looting” of company assets at the expense of the company creditors.

Are there secured liens?

First, consider if the LLC assets are encumbered by liens (perhaps an SBA loan).  If so, it may be best to put the LLC into a chapter 7, or just let is languish so the creditors pursue their remedies.  Meanwhile, dealing with the guarantors obligations.

If there are no secured debts

Consider selling the assets free and clear to a buyer, but not the business, also known as a “stock sale”.  That money should be used to pay the company creditors. Warning: if the debtor paid the funds to himself (and not to any creditors or for any company expenses), then that could be considered a fraudulent conveyance.

If no creditors:

So long as there are no LLC creditors, then you are simply dissolving and doing a distribution. Do it the right way (i.e., a corporate resolution authorizing the dissolution and the transfer of assets as a final distribution, etc.). Follow the LLC statutes regarding dissolution.

Collapsing the corporation.

This lets you file just one bankruptcy: the Chapter 13 or SBRA.  Creditors can sue the corporation, but it has no  assets.  Make sure your bill of sale says the debtor is assuming the debts of the corporation as well as buying the assets.  Actually have the debtor personally write a check to the corporation for $1000 or so to the corporation and have the corporation spend the money.